@@@@@ @   @ @@@@@    @     @ @@@@@@@   @       @  @@@@@ @@@@@ @@@
         @   @   @ @        @ @ @ @    @       @     @   @   @   @   @  @
         @   @@@@@ @@@@     @  @  @    @        @   @    @   @   @   @   @
         @   @   @ @        @     @    @         @ @     @   @   @   @  @
         @   @   @ @@@@@    @     @    @          @      @@@@@ @@@@@ @@@

                        Mt. Holz Science Fiction Society
                    Club Notice - 10/16/98 -- Vol. 17, No. 16

       MT Chair/Librarian:
                     Mark Leeper   MT 3E-433  732-957-5619 mleeper@lucent.com
       HO Chair:     John Jetzt    MT 2E-530  732-957-5087 jetzt@lucent.com
       HO Librarian: Nick Sauer    HO 4F-427  732-949-7076 njs@lucent.com
       Distinguished Heinlein Apologist:
                     Rob Mitchell  MT 2E-537  732-957-6330 robmitchell@lucent.com
       Factotum:     Evelyn Leeper MT 3E-433  732-957-2070 eleeper@lucent.com
       Back issues at http://www.geocities.com/Athens/4824
       All material copyright by author unless otherwise noted.

       The Science Fiction Association of Bergen County meets on the
       second Saturday of every month in Upper Saddle River; call
       201-447-3652 for details.  The New Jersey Science Fiction Society
       meets irregularly; call 201-652-0534 for details, or check
       http://www.interactive.net/~kat/njsfs.html.  The Denver Area
       Science Fiction Association meets 7:30 PM on the third Saturday of
       every month at Southwest State Bank, 1380 S. Federal Blvd.

       1. URL of the week:
       http://www.evolve.com/~drseuss/seuss/seuss.parody.html.  Dr.  Seuss
       Parody  Page  (including "If Dr. Seuss wrote Shakespeare" and other
       classics).  [-ecl]

       ===================================================================

       2. Fact: In New Jersey the vast  majority  of  men  have  an  above
       average number of arms.  [-mrl]

       ===================================================================

       3. Well, it is that time of year again when we  are  getting  ready
       for  Halloween.   This  was  always  my  favorite  holiday as I was
       growing up.  Of course it did not get a lot of competition.   There
       were  non-religious  holidays  and there were religious ones.  Non-
       religious holidays are usually some sort of political pay-off  that
       some  politician  used to get votes.  Labor Day was to get American
       workers' votes.  Memorial Day was the same for veterans.  Veterans'
       Day was the same target, but a different politician needed votes, I
       suppose.  Oh, I admit I liked Memorial Day as a kid.  That was  the
       start of summer.  Thanksgiving was nice, I suppose because we had a
       good meal.  Fourth of July brought fireworks.   But  on  the  whole
       neither  gave me anything that I really couldn't have done without.
       I know that is a selfish point of view,  but  I  was  just  a  kid,
       remember.   Kids  are  supposed  to  be selfish.  It is part of the
       whole kid thing.  Then there were the religious holidays, and let's
       say I was less than fond of those.  I may talk about that in a week
       coming up.

       So when I was a  kid,  the  holiday  that  I  liked  the  most  was
       Halloween.   Look  how Halloween is celebrated for kids.  The three
       ingredients are monsters, masks, and munchies.  Most kids love  all
       three and I was no exception.  One of the dates etched in my memory
       was October 31, 1959.  That was the one Halloween that  I  remember
       the  best.   We  were in Akron, visiting my grandparents.  It was a
       Saturday night.  A local TV station was advertising that they would
       have   a   monster   triple   feature.   They  would  have  SON  OF
       FRANKENSTEIN, THE MUMMY'S GHOST, and MAN-MADE MONSTER.  This for me
       was  one of the major events of the year.  First of all I had never
       seen a Frankenstein movie.  I had seen pictures of the Frankenstein
       monster in Mad Magazine and had heard about Frankenstein ever since
       I was young.  For me the  Frankenstein  monster  was  like  an  old
       friend.   But  there never was much opportunity to see the films on
       Dayton, Ohio television.  It was  in  the  early  sixties  that  TV
       stations  first could show the old Universal Pictures monster films
       and discovered that there was really a market  out  there.   Within
       just  a  few  years  most  cities  had one or maybe two TV stations
       showing a science fiction or horror  movie  as  the  late  show  on
       Saturday  night.   Things  were  getting  better  for fantasy fans.
       While Dayton did not get a lot of horror films on  TV,  some  local
       town  must  have.  TV Guide would list some stations we did not get
       and someplace nearby had a TV station listed in our TV  Guide  that
       would  have the most tempting films.  I would see films listed like
       THE WOLF MAN and I was ready to pack my  bags  and  move.   It  was
       frustrating  to know that these horror films were playing so nearby
       and I did not get a crack at them.

       But here I was, sort of cheating.  I was in Akron and here  the  TV
       stations  did  play horror films.  And three were going to be on in
       one night.  Things were definitely getting better.  Four weeks  and
       a day earlier a new weekly TV series started on CBS and already the
       high point of most weeks was when The Twilight Zone was on.  A  new
       fantasy   story   every   week  was  a  real  big  addition  to  my
       entertainment.  But that was new stuff.  SON OF FRANKENSTEIN was  a
       classic  from  the  old  days.   To  put  it in perspective, SON OF
       FRANKENSTEIN actually then was one year younger than STAR  WARS  is
       today.   But  at that time anything that was more than twice as old
       as I was, was pretty ancient.  So I stayed up late.  Not  just  me,
       both  my  parents  and both my grandparents watched also.  Now even
       today I am not sure why  everybody  was  there.   It  goes  without
       saying  that  I was the most enthusiastic about seeing these films.
       But whoever was second was a very distant  second.   I  don't  know
       where  I  got  my love of fantasy, but it certainly was not from my
       parents.  My mother saw THE BRIDE  OF  FRANKENSTEIN  when  she  was
       growing  up and right there decided that horror films were just too
       stupid to watch.  Well,  now  she  was  watching  the  sequel.   Or
       perhaps she was watching me watching the sequel.

       So this is a story with not much  of  an  ending.   I  watched  and
       immensely  enjoyed  the  first two films.  I can still remember the
       plot of the first two films, and though I had  seen  each  multiple
       times  since,  I  think  I  am  remembering them from that Saturday
       night.  SON OF FRANKENSTEIN was the  last  good  Frankenstein  film
       that Universal made.  After that they got a little threadbare.  Lon
       Chaney Jr. made three mummy movies and I still consider THE MUMMY'S
       GHOST  to  be  the  best  of the three, though that is not a lot of
       distinction.  And as for MAN-MADE MONSTER, my mother  convinced  me
       at what must have been 2:30 in the morning that it was not the time
       to start watching a third film.  I obliged her.  Then into the  60s
       our local station showed SON OF FRANKENSTEIN and THE MUMMY'S GHOST,
       but did not get around to showing MAN-MADE MONSTER for  many  years
       to  come.   Of  course these days I could set up the triple feature
       and watch it on TV commercial-free any time I want.  There is  some
       question  on  whether  I could keep myself awake, but the films are
       all available.  But I don't  think  I  could  ever  reproduce  that
       night.

       And that is why I like Halloween.  I have  given  some  thought  to
       what  films  I  would  put  together  if I were to make a Halloween
       triple feature.  This year I think I am going to do that.  I intend
       to use the magic of video to show the triple feature I wish I could
       have seen at that time.  I will show it the Thursday  night  before
       Halloween.  Details will be in next week's issue.  [-mrl]

       ===================================================================

       4. ETERNAL LOVECRAFT edited by Jim Turner (Golden Gryphon, ISBN  0-
       9655901-7-8,  1998,  411pp,  US$25.95)  (a book review by Evelyn C.
       Leeper):

       This anthology is divided into three sections.  The first is  three
       stories which either have Lovecraft as a character or are expressly
       set in Lovecraft's "universe."  The second set  is  eleven  stories
       with  some  allusions  to Lovecraft, but no direct connection.  The
       third is four stories with "implied" Lovecraft connections.  Though
       called  ETERNAL  LOVECRAFT, the connections between the stories and
       things Lovecraft seems at times tenuous, at least to me.   (If  you
       are  more  familiar with Lovecraft than I, then the connections may
       seem more obvious.)

       This is the third book from Golden Gryphon,  the  first  two  being
       collections  by  James Patrick Kelly and R. Garcia y Robertson.  As
       with the previous volumes, this is  a  well-produced,  well-crafted
       book   with  a  wonderful  wrap-around  dust  jacket  (by  Nicholas
       Jainschigg).  Unfortunately, I found the contents less interesting.
       But  as  I  said,  if you are a Lovecraft aficionado, your reaction
       will probably differ,  and  I  certainly  recommend  you  at  least
       investigate this.

       (This has nothing to do with this book, but I would like to commend
       my  public  library,  which  has  the  Kelly and Garcia y Robertson
       volumes.  It is unusual for a public library  to  track  the  small
       press  arena,  and  I'm quite pleased that my library does so.)  [-
       ecl]

       ===================================================================

       5. The 1998 Toronto International Film Festival (film  reviews  and
       commentary by Mark R. Leeper) (part 2 of 6)

       09/11/98

       I slept late for me, past 8am, but then we don't have a film  until
       11:30.   We  went to a restaurant called Fran's and I had steak and
       eggs, a rarity for me but there will be no time for lunch.

       Evelyn is planning for Kate how she can go to  every  bookstore  in
       the  area  in a sort of biblio-blitz of titanic proportions.  It is
       not enough that she is seeing 40-some films.

       After a walk up Yonge Street, stopping at a bookstore, Evelyn and I
       lined  up  at  the  Uptown and talked to the couple behind us about
       travel.  While we were standing there there was a  large  commotion
       in  the  street.  Apparently it is a local tradition is to have the
       incoming freshmen parade through  the  street.   It  is  a  raucous
       annual  event.   It takes 15 or 20 minutes for the parade to go by.
       It was a huge turnout of college kids.

       FLOWERS  OF  SHANGHAI  (Taiwan/Japanese,  language:   Chinese  with
       subtitles)

       CAPSULE: Static and dull story set  in  Shanghai  brothels  of  the
       1880s.   The  camerawork  of  this film is minimal and we basically
       have a stage play in which almost all of the  action  is  offstage.
       Nice  historic  recreations  of  room  decor  cannot make this film
       interesting to audiences.  Rating:  3 (0 to 10) -1  (-4 to +4)

          - Directed by Hou Hsiao-Hsien.
          - 124 minutes, but seems a lot longer.
          - Film  constructed  of  long  sequences  set   in   beautifully
            appointed  rooms.   Long  pauses  between dialog.  Camera just
            shifts to the character speaking so whole scene  appears  shot
            in one take.
          - 1880s Shanghai brothels.  Character  names  like  Crimson  and
            Jade.   To  Western  eyes may be hard to tell major characters
            apart.
          - Music  sounds  like  done  on  one-string  instrument.    Very
            downbeat.
          - Early scenes in heavy sepia tone though later ones seem to use
            more natural colors.
          - Characters seem to be forever eating, drinking  tea,  smoking,
            and gossiping.
          - Every scene ends in slow fade to black.
          - Only two scenes have any action beyond talk.
          - Very much like a stage play.
          - Some sort of numbers game repeatedly played over banquets, but
            not  clear  what  the  rules are.  It looks something like our
            Evens and Odds.
          - Women seem to be involved with little  but  jealousy,  hatred,
            and greed.
          - Style reminiscent of Fassbinder's EFFIE BRIEST.
          - Shown in a large theater, but many people walking out.
          - Better knowledge of Chinese culture might have helped.

       Over to the Cumberland for...

       APRIL STORY (Japanese with subtitles)

       CAPSULE: A pleasant  slice-of-life  about  a  woman  from  Hokkaido
       adapting  to life at a Tokyo University.  Toward the end there is a
       twist and the viewer discovers the plot  has  been  developing  all
       along.  Rating: 6 (0 to 10),  high +1 (-4 to +4)

          - Directed by Shunji Iwai
          - Young woman leaving Hokkaido to go to Musashino University  in
            Tokyo.
          - Slice-of-life style just shows what life is like adjusting  to
            her   tiny  dorm  room,  her  nervousness  about  meeting  new
            classmates,  We also see her  recreation  as  she  goes  to  a
            movie,  becomes  a  regular  at a local bookstore, makes a few
            friends, joins a school fishing club.   Her  life  seems  very
            lonely.
          - Story could have taken place in England, US, Canada, etc.
          - Dorms in Japan seem  very  depressing.   Tiny  rooms,  rundown
            walls, rust on metal.
          - Appears to be snowing when she leaves Hokkaido  and  when  she
            arrives  in  Tokyo.   You  realize in Tokyo it is actually not
            snow but apple blossoms falling.  There is a pleasant  musical
            theme as the score.  It seems to be played on a single piano.
          - Film is short, about 67 minutes.  Seems like it  could  be  an
            afternoon TV program for high school girls.

       We had dinner at a place called  FORKCHOPS  that  offered  Japanese
       style  bowls  of soup.  It seemed to go with the film and soup is a
       filling dinner.

       AFTER LIFE (Japanese with subtitles)

       CAPSULE: The recently dead must  each  choose  the  most  memorable
       moment  of  their  lives to have them filmed.  Once this process is
       complete they  can  continue  on  to  heaven.   The  film  combines
       documentary  footage with interviews with dramatic storytelling.  A
       little slow at times, but worthwhile over all.   Rating:  6  (0  to
       10), high +1 (-4 to +4)

          - Directed by Hirokazu Kore-Eda.
          - When one dies, according to the premise  of  this  film,  each
            person  must  choose  the  best  moment of his life to have it
            recreated on film, then to live it for eternity.  One  gets  a
            week complete with advisors to get this accomplished.  This is
            the story of one week in this odd purgatory.
          - The building used for this purpose seems to be  some  sort  of
            old  school  building.   It  is  one  much  in  needing  of  a
            repainting.  There is a staff of advisors, many with their own
            problems,  trying to help the dead in their task by counseling
            them on what moment to choose and then helping them to get  it
            filmed.
          - Much of  the  film  is  real  documentary  footage  of  people
            choosing  and  talking  about  the  most significant moment in
            their lives.  Actors hired for the film and when possible they
            talked  about  moments  from their lives.  Only the actors who
            had scripted key moments were those who were  needed  for  the
            story.   This  use  of  interview material reminiscent of some
            Aardman animated films.
          - Not clear why the moments chosen by the dead had to be  filmed
            by them except that the director had the facilities.  Only one
            or two moments are seen being filmed.

       VERY BAD THINGS (United States)

       CAPSULE:  Five  friends  at  a  stag  party  are  involved  in  the
       accidental killing of a prostitute.  The cover-up attempt becomes a
       monster that eats up the friends, two wives  and  several  innocent
       bystanders.   This  was  a real audience pleaser at Toronto, but it
       did not do much for me.  Rating: 4 (0 to 10), low 0 (-4 to +4)

          - Directed by Peter Berg who acted in  THE  LAST  SEDUCTION  and
            COPLAND.
          - Five buddies go on a stag outing to Las  Vegas  while  Cameron
            Diaz  works  through  the logistics of her upcoming wedding to
            one  of  them.   One  of  the  buddies  accidentally  kills  a
            prostitute.
          - Several people with no moral compass.  They started out with a
            simple, innocent little cocaine party (!) and by accident look
            what happened.  They have one moral person among them  (Daniel
            Stern),  and one totally amoral person (Christian Slater).  It
            is more selfish to let the amoral lead, so they do.
          - This film is strange, but not really funny or  biting.   Black
            comedy  should  actually  be  funny as well as strange.  There
            should be some element of satire.  The satire is missing here.
            I did not find myself laughing here either.  What we have is a
            strange crime tale.
          - One just does not care what happens to these people.
          - The same idea of people just getting themselves in deeper  and
            deeper  has  been done frequently.  If this film is popular it
            is just bringing a familiar plot to a new generation.
          - It begins like DINER (particularly with Daniel Stern) and ends
            up like an extended horror/crime comic book.
          - There are several logical holes in script.  If a security  man
            goes  to  investigate a complaint and disappears, wouldn't the
            guests he was investigating be the  first  suspects?   Someone
            framed  for  a crime in the way shown would be judged innocent
            after minimal forensic  detective  work.   (I  am  desperately
            trying to avoid making this a spoiler.)
          - Popular and situation ethics get a real slamming.
          - Some acting of grief is hammy and overdone.  More yelling than
            humor.

       I left the theater by the back way since I was late to line up  for
       the  next  film.   There  were  a  bunch  of limousines waiting for
       celebrities.  The limousines were all decorated with "Just Married"
       to  fool  people.   How  many people you know have a fancy marriage
       with limousines at 10:00 at night?

       PERDITA DURANGO (Spanish, in English and Spanish with subtitles)

       CAPSULE: Lots of gunplay, some humor.  The further adventures  from
       one of the characters from WILD AT HEART.  The title character runs
       into a sexy Mexican Santeria priest and they decide to kidnap  some
       bland Americans and eat them.  Pretty weird stuff.  Rating: 4 (0 to
       10), 0 (-4 to +4)

          - Directed by Alex de la Iglesia.
          - Rosie Perez in an obviously very counter-culture film.  Javier
            Bardem  also  stars  as  the  killer and Santeria priest Romeo
            Doloroso.  Screamin' Jay Hawkins also  appears.   Perez  plays
            Perdita   Durango,  the  same  character  played  by  Isabella
            Rossellini in David Lynch's WILD AT HEART.
          - No characters to  identify  with.   Main  character  wants  to
            kidnap and eat people to make a statement.
          - Lots of running gags, explosions, gunplay, running gags,  cars
            hitting people, and running gags.
          - A little of John Waters-like take on American culture.
          - Colorful but overly long.
          - Obviously a film that got a budget but it  is  not  clear  the
            intended audience besides hip midnight crowds.
          - Possibly lost on Canadian or American audience:  Romeo robs  a
            bank disguised as Santo, a Mexican movie hero and professional
            wrestler.
          - Simon Boswell's musical score is very dramatic.

       The film got over about 2:20 and got back to the  room  about  2:50
       and  we  were  asleep by 3:10, enough time to get some sleep before
       our 9 AM film.  But not enough.

       09/12/98

       Up early and rushing to our first film.  I buy a  bottle  of  fruit
       juice.  I will drink it in line and watching the first movie.  Also
       I have stuffed in the pockets of my photovest an individual serving
       box  of cereal.  We got a variety pack before we left home for just
       this purpose.

       JEANNE AND THE PERFECT GUY (French with English Subtitles)

       CAPSULE: How do you tell a now fairly familiar love  story  set  in
       the  time  of  AIDS?   The  French do it by turning it into a light
       musical.  Virginie Ledoyen is charming as a young woman  who  finds
       her new lover is HIV-positive.  Rating:  7 (0 to 10), low +2 (-4 to
       +4)

          - Directed by Olivier Ducastel and Jacques Martineau
          - The musical is not my favorite genre of  film.   Musicals  got
            too  big  with  ornate  production  numbers in the US and fell
            apart of their own weight.  Woody Allen tried his own hand  at
            the  musical  with  EVERYONE SAYS I LOVE YOU.  It just did not
            work for me.  The French have a better approach.  They do  not
            build  the  story  around  huge production numbers.  They just
            tell their story and at various moments a character will  sing
            a simple song.  Perhaps there will be a few dance steps.
          - Virginie LeDoyen plays a switchboard operator  who  rarely  is
            lacking  a  bed-partner.   But  Jeanne  is  anxious  to find a
            perfect lover.   She  finds  one,  Olivier  LaGrange  (Mathieu
            Demy),  on  the  underground, only to find he is HIV positive.
            Without her realizing it they have  a  mutual  friend,  a  gay
            school  professor  who  knows  Olivier  from  ACT-UP, the AIDS
            activist group.
          - Hard to imagine Jeanne is this promiscuous  and  this  is  the
            first time she has been touched by AIDS.
          - Musical numbers seem to start up very naturally.   Often  they
            are  on  unexpected  subjects  like  Tsing-tao Beer or foreign
            workers singing how they cannot get naturalization papers.
          - Most of the plot twists are predictable.
          - Last scene of film very different that what we would  have  in
            an American film.

       After the movie we went to find a place to sit down.   A  cafe  had
       some  chairs  they had chained up and they were using so we sat and
       wrote.  Unfortunately I sat under an overhang and  a  local  pigeon
       used me for target practice.  Good shot, dammit.

       LAST NIGHT (Canadian)

       CAPSULE: The world will come to an end at midnight.  Everyone knows
       it  and must make a final peace with the last hours of their lives.
       This is  an  intelligent  science  fiction  film  with  no  special
       effects,  just  personalities and ideas.  Rating: 8 (0 to 10), high
       +2 (-4 to +4)

          - It is the last night  of  the  planet  and  several  different
            people  are  reacting  each  in their own way to the end.  The
            film covers 6 PM to midnight.  The main character  is  Patrick
            played by David McKellan who also wrote and directed.
          - Reminiscent of ON THE BEACH.  But much  more  so  of  a  story
            Richard  Matheson  wrote, "The Last Day."  (P.S.  On rereading
            the 1953 Matheson, this film is almost a loose  adaptation  of
            that  story.   The  similarities  may be mere coincidence, but
            they are numerous and they are very striking.)
          - US release may be problematical.  The title is lackluster  and
            non-memorable, though very appropriate when you know about the
            film.  Also provincial Americans may not care about the end of
            the  world  coming  to  Toronto.   They probably would feel it
            would not  affect  them.   Perhaps  a  PBS  release  would  be
            possible.
          - Patrick's family has declared it Christmas and are  hurt  that
            the  (adult)  children  will  not spend the whole evening with
            them.
          - Grocery stores mostly looted.  It seems  though  that  one  of
            everything is left.
          - Some people continue business as usual, some  want  sex,  some
            react  with  religion,  some  riot.   Some people are in total
            denial.
          - Much comedy, much drama.
          - Very Canadian cast.
          - It does not get dark.  It is just always daytime.
          - Radio playing "Last Night I Didn't Get to Sleep At All."   How
            appropriate.
          - David Cronenberg as a kind of bland functionary manager at the
            gas  company.   Genvieve  Bujold  as  French  teacher visiting
            former student.
          - Science fiction film with no special effects, cost  about  two
            million dollars.
          - The person you  have  been  thrown  together  with  by  chance
            becomes  the most important person to you for the rest of your
            life.
          - Why would it be so precisely at midnight?   What  about  other
            time  zones?   What  is  the  nature of what is destroying the
            world?

       We had lunch at an Indian restaurant Mr. Mahaaraja.  I had a  thali
       that  featured  calimari.   The  sauce was much better than at most
       Indian restaurants in  the  US.   We  talked  to  two  women  in  a
       restaurant who were asking about our palmtops.

       [to be continued]  [-mrl]

                                          Mark Leeper
                                          MT 3E-433 732-957-5619
                                          mleeper@lucent.com

            Transcendental numbers occupy a position in the
            field of real or complex numbers much like that of
            insects in the kingdom of animals.  Everybody knows
            they are, by a large margin, the most abundant class,
            but few know more than one or two of them by name.
                                          -- Donald R. Newman